نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه اقتصاد، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات اجتماعی جهاددانشگاهی، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصادی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران

چکیده

سیاست مالی صلاحدیدی به تغییرات صلاحدیدی مالیات، مخارج و یا دیگر فعالیت‌های مالی توسط دولت در پاسخ به رویدادهای اقتصادی یا تغییر در شرایط اقتصادی اشاره دارد. اتخاذ این سیاست‌ درصورتی‌که در راستای ثبات نوسانات نباشد، می‌تواند آثار زیان باری بر متغیرهای اقتصادی برجا گذارد. هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی اثرات سیاست مالی صلاحدیدی بر مصرف و سرمایه‌گذاری خصوصی در ایران است. ازاین‌رو ابتدا تابع واکنش مالی در ایران طی دوره زمانی 1357 الی 1401 طبق الگوی فتاز و میهو (2003 و 2006) با استفاده از رویکرد2SLS-IV برآورد گشته و سپس از طریق این تابع، سیاست‌های مالی صلاحدیدی استخراج و بررسی می‌گردد. بر اساس تابع واکنش مالی، سیاست مالی در ایران طی دوره موردبررسی رفتار موافق چرخه‌ای دارد‌. همچنین با استخراج سیاست مالی صلاحدیدی از تابع واکنش مالی و بررسی اثرات آن با استفاده از رویکرد GMM، وجود اثر برون‌رانی یا جایگزینی (Crowding-out) در مصرف و سرمایه‌گذاری تأیید گردیده است. به‌طوری‌که بزرگی اثرات مخرب برون‌رانی در سرمایه‌گذاری بیشتر از مصرف به‌دست‌آمده است. به‌عبارت‌دیگر، اتخاذ سیاست مالی صلاحدیدی در ایران موجب رانده‌شده بخش خصوصی از سرمایه‌گذاری در این بخش و نیز کاهش مصرف خانوار شده و بنابراین می‌تواند از این طریق آثار مخربی بر رشد اقتصادی برجا گذارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

  1. Abbasian, E. , Ferdowsi, M. and Mahmoudi, V. (2011). Examining the substitution and complementary effects of government spending in the construction sector from the perspective of financing. Economic Research and Policy, 20(62), 23-38. (in persian)
  2. Afonso, A. Agnello, L. and Furceri, D. (2010). Fiscal Policy Responsiveness, Persistence And Discretion. Public Choice 145 (3), 503–530
  3. Aghili, Far H. , Piraei, Kh. , Zare, H. and Ebrahimi, M. (1401). Cyclical financial policy in Iran; The role of types of government expenditures and influencing factors. Monetary and Banking Research Quarterly, 15th year, 53, 475-503. (in persian)
  4. Agnello, L. and Sousa, R.M. (2011). Can Fiscal Policy Stimulus Boost Economic Recovery?. Revue Économique 62 (6), 1045–1066.
  5. Agnello, L., Castro, V. and Sousa, R.M. (2012). How Does Fiscal Policy React To Wealth Composition And Asset Prices?. Journal of Macroeconomics 34 (3), 874–890.
  6. Agnello, L., Furceri, D. and Sousa, R.J. (2013). How Best To Measure Discretionary Fiscal Policy?: Assessing Its Impact On Private Spending. Economic Modelling, 34. pp. 15-24. ISSN 0264-9993
  7. Aiyagari, R., Christiano, L. and Eichenbaum, M. (1990). Output, Employment And Interest Rate Effects Of Government Consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics 30, 73–86
  8. Alesina, A. and Ardagna, S. (2010). Large changes in fiscal policy: taxes versus spending. In: Brown, J.R. (Ed.) , Tax Policy and the Economy 24, 35–68.
  9. Arrelano, M.  and Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests Of Specification In Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence And An Application To Employment Equations. Review of Economics and Statistics58: 277-297.
  10. Asgharpour, H., Salmani, B. and Ebrahimi, S. (2013). Empirical analysis of the effect of government spending on private consumption in Iran.Economic Development Research Quarterly, 8, 105-132. (in persian)
  11. Athanasios, T. (2014). Discretionary fiscal policy and economic activity in Greece, Empirica, Springer. Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, 41(4), 687-712.
  12. Attinasi, M. G. and Klemm, A. (2016). The Growth Impact Of Discretionary Fiscal Policy Measures. Journal of Macroeconomics, 49 (3), 265-279.
  13. Auerbach, A., J., and Feenberg, D. R. (2000). The Significance Of Federal Taxes As Automatic Stabilizers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14 (3), 37-56.
  14. Badinger, H. (2009). Fiscal Rules, Discretionary Fiscal Policy And Macroeconomic Stability: An Empirical Assessment For OECD CountriesApplied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, 41(7), 829-847.
  15. Baldacci, E. and Kumar, M.S. (2010). Fiscal Deficits, Public Debt, And Sovereign Bond Yields. International Monetary Fund, IMF Working Paper No. 184.
  16. Bank, A. (2011). Effects Of Discretionary Fiscal Policy: New Empirical Evidence For GermanyHannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-470, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
  17. Baxter, M. and King, R. (1993). Fiscal Policy In General Equilibrium. The American Economic Review 83, 315–334.
  18. Beetsma, R. and Giuliodori, M. (2010). Discretionary Fiscal Policy: Review and Estimates for the EUCESifo Working Paper Series 2948, CESifo.
  19. Blanchard, O. (2003). Macroeconomics, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall.
  20. Blanchard, O. and Perotti, R. (2002). An Empirical Characterization Of The Dynamic Effects Of Changes In Government Spending And Taxes On Output. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (4), 1329–1368.
  21. Bohn, H. (1998). The Behavior Of U.S. Public Debt And Deficits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 949-963.
  22. Boiciuc, I. (2015). The Cyclical Behavior Of Fiscal Policy In Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32 , 286 – 291.
  23. Buti, M.  and Noord, P.V. (2004). Fiscal Discretion and Elections in the Early Years of EMUJournal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, 42(4), 737-756.
  24. Chajat Far, Y. (2014). Investigating The Effect Of Government Spending On Private Investment In Iran. Applied Economics Theories, 2(1), 143-162. (in persian)
  25. Christiano, L. and Eichenbaum, M. (1992). Current Real Business Cycles Theories And Aggregate Labor Market Fluctuations. The American Economic Review 8
  26. Dindar Rostami, M. ,  Shirinbakhsh, Sh. and  Afshari, Z. (2019). The Effects of Oil Price Shocks on Discretionary Fiscal Policy in Selected OPEC Countries: Panel Structural Vector Autoregressive.  8( 15), 7-25.(in persian)
  27. Fatás, A. and Mihov, I. (2003). The Case For Restricting Discretionary Fiscal Policy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 1419–1447.
  28. Fatás, A. and Mihov, I. (2003). The Case For Restricting Discretionary Fiscal Policy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 1419–1447.
  29. Fatás, A. and Mihov, I. (2006). The Macroeconomics Effects Of Fiscal Rules In The US States. Journal of Public Economics 90, 101–117.
  30. Fath Elahi, E. (1402). Investigating Economic And Social Factors Affecting Government Spending In Iran. Economic Policies and Research, 2(2), 55-9. (in persian)
  31. Firoozabadi, R., Dahmardeh Ghaleno, S., Shahiki Tash, N. and Nabi, M. (2022). Crowding out or Crowding in? Government Spending Effects on the Private Sector in Iran, International Economic Studies. 51(2), 67-84. (In Persian)
  32. Furceri, D. and Sousa, R.M. (2011a). The Impact Of Government Spending On The Private Sector: Crowding-Out Versus Crowding-In Effects. 64 (4), 516–533.
  33. Furceri, D. and Sousa, R.M. (2011b). Does Government Spending Crowd-Out Private Consumption And Investment? Theory And Some Empirical Evidence. World Economics 12 (4), 153–170.
  34. Gali, J. and Perotti, R. (2003). Fiscal Policy And Monetary Integration In Europe. NBER Working Papers9773, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  35. Ghasemi, M. and Mohajeri, P. (2014). Investigating the cyclical behavior of fiscal policy in Iran. Economic Research Quarterly, 15(56), 75-104. (in persian)
  36. Gilak Hakim Abadi, M. and Taghi Mehrgan, A. (1400), An Analysis Of The Automatic Stabilization Of Direct And Indirect Taxes In Iran, Economic Modeling, 15(55), 1-19. (in persian)
  37. Granger,G.W.J., (2004). Time Series Analysis Cointegration, And Applications. Am. Econ. REV.94(3),421-425.
  38. Greene, W. (2011). Fixed Effects Vector Decomposition: A Magical Solution To The Problem Of Time-Invariant Variables In Fixed Effects Models?. Political Analysis, 19(2), 135-146.
  39. Greene,W.H., (1993).Econometrics Analysis,Fifth Ed.Prentice Hal, New Jersey.
  40. Greiner, A., Semmler, W. and Gong, G. (2016). The forces of economic growth: a time series perspective. Princeton University Press.
  41. Hagemann, R. P. (1999). The Structural Budget Balance: The IMF’s Methodology. IMF Working Paper WP/99/95.
  42. Islamloian, K. , Shafiei Sarostani, M. and Jafari, M. (2009). Investigating the effect of trade openness on macro variables in Iran's economy. Iranian Economic Research Quarterly, 14(43).1-21. (in persian)
  43. Jaeger, A. (1990). The Measurement and Interpretation of Structural Budget Balances. Empirica, 17(2), 155-169.
  44. Jansen, K. (2004). The Scope for Fiscal Policy: A Case Study Of Thailand. Development Policy Review. 22(2), 207–228.
  45. Jha, Sh. , Mallick, S. K., Park, D. and Quising ,P. (2014). Effectiveness Of Countercyclical Fiscal Policy: Evidence From Developing Asia. Journal of Macroeconomics,40, 82–98.
  46. Kazemi, A. T. and Arabi, Z. (2013). The Effect Of Government Spending On Private Investment In Iran During The Period 1389-1341. Iranian Applied Economic Studies Quarterly, 3(9), 223-245. (in persian)
  47. Khalili Iraqi, M. and Sharifi, H. (2017). The Effect Of Government Spending on Private Sector Consumption And Investment in The Form Of VAR And FAVAR Models. Economic Modeling, 12(2), 117-99. (in persian)
  48. Mahmoudzadeh, M., Sadeghi, S. and Sadeghi, S. (2019). The Effect Of Financial Expenditure On Private Investment In Iran (Testing The C.O.E Hypothesis). Planning And Budget, 16(2), 131-146. (in persian)
  49. Mohammadpour, S., Rezazadeh, A. and Reofi, A. (2018). Investigating The Relationship Between Degree Of Trade Openness And Economic Growth In Selected MENA Countries: Grangerian Causality Panel Bootstrap Approach. Quantitative Economics Quarterly, 16(4), 101-128. (in persian)
  50. Montes, G. and Luna, P. H. (2018). Discretionary Fiscal Policy And Disagreement In Expectations About Fiscal Variables Empirical Evidence From Brazil. Economic Modelling, Elsevier, 73, 100-116.
  51. Montes, G. C. and Lima, N. T. (2022). Discretionary Fiscal Policy, Fiscal Credibility And Inflation Risk PremiumThe Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, 85, 208-222.
  52. Montes, G. C. and Luna, P. H. (2018). Discretionary Fiscal Policy And Disagreement In Expectations About Fiscal Variables Empirical Evidence From BrazilEconomic Modelling, Elsevier, 73(3), 100-116.
  53. Nadiri, M. and Mohammadi, T. (1390). Examining The Effect Of Institutional Structures On Economic Growth With The GMM Method Of Dynamic Panel Data. Economic Modelling, 5(3(15)) , 1-24. (in persian)
  54. Ofgeh, S. M. , Mansouri, S. A., Moltafat, H. and Baharond, P. (1401). Investigating the effect of demographic changes and human capital on economic growth in Iran. Stable Economics, 3(1), 161-185. (in persian)
  55. Pezhoyan, J. and Khosravi, T. (2012). The effect of inflation on private sector investment. Investing Science Quarterly, 1(4), 1-17. (in persian)
  56. Rafei, M., Bahrami, J. and Danesh Jafari, D. (2013). Evaluation of fiscal policy for the Iranian economy in a stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model based on real business cycles. Economic Research Quarterly, 14(54) 33-65. (in persian)
  57. Samadi, A. and Ojimehr, S. (2011). Investigating the factors influencing the cyclical favorable behavior of fiscal policy with an emphasis on oil price volatility: a case study of Iran (1386-1353). Bi-quarterly journal of Iranian economic essays with the approach of Islamic economy, 9(18), 29-57. (in persian)
  58. Sharifi, N. and Alizadeh, M. (1381). The effect of government spending on the regional economy using social accounting matrix (case study of Golestan province). Iran Economic Research, 4(13), 33-56. (in persian)
  59. Swanepoel, J.A. and Schoeman, J.N. (2003). Countercyclical Fiscal Policy in South Africa: Role and Impact of Automatic Fiscal Stabilisers. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 6 (4), 802-822.
  60. Url, Th. (1997). How Serious is the Pact on Stability and Growth?. Austrian Institute of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 92.
  61. Zarei, J. (2014). Cyclical behavior of financial policy and factors affecting it with emphasis on the role of financial rules. Banking Monetary Research, 8(26), 543-569. (in persian)