نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.
2 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.
چکیده
شهرک‌های فناوری یکی ازمکان‌های رو به رشدی می‌باشد که اخیرا در سرتاسر جهان مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. این قابلیت به رشد توانمندی های صنعتی و فناوری در کشورهای توسعه یافته کمک شایانی نموده است. در این راستا کشورهای مذبور برای ایجاد و توسعه آن ها، هزینه ها و بودجه های زیادی صرف نموده اند. بر این اساس، پژوهش حاضر با روش زمینه یابی و با هدف بررسی اولویت‌ها و راهبرد های توسعه شهرک های فناوری در ایران و مشخصا استان کردستان، انجام شده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل کلیه خبرگان و کارشناسان آشنا به بحث در شرکت شهرک‌های صنعتی، سازمان صمت و دانشگاه کردستان است. به منظور برررسی ظرفیت‌ها و مزیت‌های نسبی و رقابتی استان کردستان پرسشنامه‌ای میان خبرگان توزیع گردید. بر اساس نتایج، اولویت‌دارترین حوزه ها و فناوری های دارای مزیت نسبی و رقابتی شامل صنایع تبدیلی- کشاورزی، صنایع کانی- غیرفلزی و صنعت فرش بوده است. راهبردهای توسعه و استقرار این شهرک ها نیز با تمرکز بر شناسایی خلأها و نیازهای صنعت با استفاده از مدل برنامه ریزی SWOT ، تحلیل گردید. پیشنهاد گردید تا به منظور استقرار شهرک های فناوری بر اساس سند توسعه استان کردستان و اسناد بالادستی کشور، انجام شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
Ajmera P. (2017). Ranking the strategies for Indian medical tourism sector through the integration of SWOT analysis and TOPSIS method. International journal of health care quality assurance, 30 (8), 668–679. https://doi. org/10. 1108/IJHCQA-05-2016-0073
Bamdad, N., Gholam A. F. & Parisa, R. (2008). A model for marketing management of science and technology parks. Quart. J. Res. Plann. Higher Educ., 14 (3): 69-95. (in persion)
Brasil, N. (2016). Presidência da República. Lei 13243 de 11 de janeiro de 2016. Retrieved from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2016/lei/l13243. htm
Burbridge, M., & Morrison, G. M. (2021). A Systematic Literature Review of partnership development at the university–industry–government nexus. Sustainability, 13(24), 13780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413780
Caglar, A. E., Daştan, M., Mehmood, U., & Avci, S. B. (2023). Assessing the connection between competitive industrial performance on load capacity factor within the LCC framework: Implications for sustainable policy in BRICS economies. Environmental science and pollution research international. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29178-1
Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). The determinants of organizational change and structural inertia: technological and organizational factors. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 11, 595– 635. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j. 1430-9134. 2002. 00595. x
Drucker, J. M., Kayanan, C. M., & Renski, H. C. (2019). Innovation Districts as a Strategy for Urban Economic Development: A Comparison of Four Cases. Available at SSRN 3498319. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3498319
Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2007). Public procurement and innovation—Resurrecting the demand side. Research policy, 36(7), 949-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003.
Eom, B. Y., & Lee, K. (2010). Determinants of industry–academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization. Research policy, 39(5), 625-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.015
European Commission. (2013). Setting up, managing and evaluating EU science and technology parks
Faramarzpur, M. (2009). Challenging factors for growth centers and science and technology parks, Biotechnology Monthly, 13, 7-4. (in Persian)
Farjadi, G. A. & Riahi, P. (2016). surveying the local market of science and technology parks in Iran. Quarterly journal of research and planning in higher education. 2(13). (in Persian)
Fochler, M. (2016). Beyond and between academia and business: How Austrian biotechnology researchers describe high-tech startup companies as spaces of knowledge production. Social studies of science, 46(2), 259-281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716629831
Ghoronh, H., Tabaian, S. K., Bushehri, A. R., & Ghorbani, S. (2017). Identifying and prioritizing policy tools to support new technology-based firms’ cooperation with public industries in Iran, a futures studies approach. Journal of Futures Studies, 22(1), 57-72. DOI:10.6531/JFS.2017.22(1).A57
Haeri Izadi, M. (2006). Science parks, expectations, models and achievements. Quart. J. Technol. Dev. (Roshd-e-Fanavari), 8: 26. (in Persian)
Hamhami, A., Amrani, A. K., & Smahi, A. (2020). Environmental economics in Algeria: Empirical investigation into the relationship between technological policy, regulation intensity, market forces, and industrial pollution of Algerian firms. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(36), 45419-45434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10411-0
Hosang, M. (2014). Venture capital investment in the life sciences in Switzerland. Chimia, 68(12), 847-847. https://doi.org/10.2533/chimia.2014.847
http://www.rieti.go.jp/en/projects/program/pg-06/index.html
https://www.gfmag.com/global-data/non-economic-data/best-tech-countrie (2023)
Jafari, M. (2009). Ruling trends in the field of service technologies. Tadbir Monthly, 17th year, number 178. 2005- Pourezat, Aliasghar; Qalipour, Arin and Nadir Khanlou, Samira. (Identification and prioritization of effective factors in commercialization of knowledge in universities). Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, second year, number 7, spring (in Persian)
Jafari, M., Akhavan, P., & Akhtari, M. (2012). Knowledge Management: A Comprehensive Overview of the Tools and Techniques. Rasa Cultural Services Institute, Tehran.
Jafarnejad, A. & A. Ghasemi, (2008). Providing the model of technology acquisition according to the strategy of intellectual capital (case study: Companies located in science and technology park of University of Tehran. Quart. J. IT Manag., 1: 19-36. (in Persian)
Koh, F. C., Koh, W. T., & Tschang, F. T. (2005). An analytical framework for science parks and technology districts with an application to Singapore. Journal of business venturing, 20(2), 217-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.002
Lamperti, F., Mavilia, R., & Castellini, S. (2017). The role of Science Parks: a puzzle of growth, innovation and R&D investments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 158-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-0159455-2.
Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2001). Science parks in Sweden–industrial renewal and development?. R&d Management, 31(3), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00219
Majlis Research Center - Deputy for Infrastructure Research and Production Affairs - rc. majlis. ir
Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation (2011), "The Top: Towards a New Enterprise Policy", 4 February 2011
Nasution, H. N., Mavondo, F. T., Matanda, M. J., & Ndubisi, N. O. (2011). Entrepreneurship: Its relationship with market orientation and learning orientation and as antecedents to innovation and customer value. Industrial marketing management, 40(3), 336-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.08.002
Nikina, A., Piqué, J., & Miquel, J. (2016). Areas of innovation in a global world: Concept and practice. Campanillas: IASP.
Nummela, N., Puumalainen, K., & Saarenketo, S. (2005). International growth orientation of knowledge-intensive SMEs. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3, 5-18.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) - oecd.org
Organization of industry, mining and trade (mimt.gov.ir)
Organization of Small Industries and Industrial Towns of Iran- eservice.isipo.ir
O'Shea, R., Allen, T. J., O'Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2004). Universities and technology transfer: A review of academic entrepreneurship literature. Irish Journal of Management, 25(2).
Parry, M. (2020). Science and technology parks and universities–facing the next industrial revolution. Higher Education in the Arab World: Building a Culture of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 109-140.
Rowe, D. (2013). Setting up, Managing and Evaluating EU Science and Technology Parks. Brussels: EU Commission, Forthcoming.
Salvador, E. (2011). Are science parks and incubators good “brand names” for spin-offs? The case study of Turin. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 203-232. DOI 10.1007/s10961-010-9152-0
Segal, N. S. (1986). Universities and technological entrepreneurship in Britain: some implications of the Cambridge phenomenon. Technovation, 4(3), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(86)90012-X
Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003). Assessing the impact of university science parks on research productivity: Exploratory frm-level evidence from the United Kingdom. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1357–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00086
Taati, M. and Bahrami, M. (2009). A comparative study of factors affecting the future of science and technology management in Iran until the horizon of 2025 based on the experts and policy makers' viewpoint. Quart.J.Sci. Technol. Policy, 2 (2): 47-61. (in Persian)
Tavallaei, M. (2006). Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of Science Parks in Iran: The effects of new technologies. Quart.J.Technol.Dev.(Roshd -e- Fanavari), 8: 26. (in persian)
Weng, X. H., Zhu, Y. M., Song, X. Y., & Ahmad, N. (2019). Identification of key success factors for private science parks established from brownfield regeneration: A case study from China. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(7), 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071295
Yang, W. T., & Lee, W. H. (2000). A study on management performance of Taiwan high technology industry–the Hsinchu Science Park experience. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 21(1), 19-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02522667.2000.10699435
)